Innovation and R&D Teams
Guided example for innovation and R&D teams with Claude Desktop
Use Case
A beauty brand plans to expand its skincare line with an anti-acne serum formulated for combination skin and aimed at Gen-Z consumers. The team wants to pair consumer-trusted acne-fighting ingredients with a fragrance profile that resonates with younger noses.
The Innovation and R&D team connects Claude to CosmetiQ-MCP and begin digging into the dataset for actionable insights.
Ask Claude to connect to CometiQ-MCP
Prompt the following into Claude Desktop to connect ComsetiQ's demo envirnonment:
Connect to CosmetiQ-MCP!
Generate a Market-Overview Dashboard
Let's query CosmetiQ's dataset with:
My team is developing an anti-acne serum for combination skin, targeted at Gen-Z consumers through an optimal fragrance strategy.
Please generate a comprehensive market-overview dashboard to guide our research case, with focus on consumer-trusted ingredients and fragrance profiles loved by younger nose.Here's the dashboard (made with Claude in seconds by analysing ComsetiQ-MCP data):

Here's the key insights from the dashboard:

Here's the tep-by-step process Claude used to generate that comprehensive dashboard and insights:
🔗 Step 1: Database Connection
First, I connected to the CosmetiQ database using the cosmetiq_connect function. This gave me:
A unique connection ID for all subsequent queries
Overview of available schemas (
core,ref,information_schema)Understanding of my role as "Q" - the AI agent for cosmetic industry insights
🔍 Step 2: Data Structure Exploration
I explored the database structure to understand what data was available:
Checked column names in
olyoung_essence_reviews_aitableDiscovered the exact naming conventions (e.g.,
"SkinType Combination"vs"SkinType_Combination")Found star rating columns like
"Review stars 1-5 product general"Located ingredient columns with pattern
"Ingredient [name]"
🎯 Step 3: Target Market Analysis
I ran specific queries to analyze anti-acne products for combination skin:
-- Example query structure
SELECT columns
FROM core.olyoung_essence_reviews_ai
WHERE "SkinType Combination" = 1
AND "Effect reduced Acne" > 0🧪 Step 4: Ingredient Performance Analysis
I analyzed the top-performing ingredients by:
Using UNION queries to compare multiple ingredients
Calculating average ratings, review counts, and effectiveness scores
Focusing on key anti-acne ingredients: Niacinamide, Centella Asiatica, Salicylic Acid
🌸 Step 5: Fragrance Preferences Research
I queried the fragrance-specific table (olyoung_essence_reviews_ai_fragrance) to understand:
Scent family preferences (fruity, citrus, floral, aromatic)
Pleasantness scores and intensity preferences
Comfort levels with different fragrance profiles
🌍 Step 6: Global Market Insights
I analyzed consumer demographics by:
Grouping reviews by
"Origin"(language as proxy for region)Calculating satisfaction scores by market
Identifying primary and emerging markets
📊 Step 7: Dashboard Creation
I created an interactive HTML dashboard with:
Chart.js for data visualizations (doughnut and bar charts)
Responsive CSS Grid layout for optimal viewing
Modern design with gradients, shadows, and hover effects
Real data integration from my SQL queries
💡 Step 8: Insight Synthesis
Finally, I synthesized all data into actionable insights:
Quantified recommendations (e.g., "343 reviews", "4.86/5 satisfaction")
Strategic priorities ranked by data strength
Clear next steps for product development
This methodology ensures data-driven, actionable insights while maintaining visual appeal and professional presentation for your team's decision-making process.
Evaluate which “support” ingredients pair best with Niacinamide or Centella Asiatica (CICA)
After having analysing key insights from CosmetiQ-MCP, we can sharpen the research topic with a new angle by prompting:
Based on the same research topic, which are the secondary ingredients consumers love most when paired with Niacinamide and with Centella Asiatica in anti-acne products for combination skin?Here's a new dashboard for decision making on the topic:


Here's the key findings:
🎯 Evidence-Based Anti-Acne Insights
🏆 Real Performance Champions
1. Niacinamide + Zinc PCA
7.69% acne success rate (vs 2.93% market baseline)
+163% improvement over market baseline
+179% improvement over Niacinamide alone
Highest efficacy but smaller sample (143 reviews)
2. Centella + Madecassoside
7.08% acne success rate
+142% improvement over market baseline
1,215 reviews validation (high statistical significance)
Best balance of efficacy + validation
3. Centella + Hyaluronic Acid
4.00% acne success rate
+37% improvement over market baseline
2,500 reviews (mass market validated)
Solid improvement with maximum consumer validation
🔬 Key Market Realities
Baseline Performance:
Market baseline: 2.93% acne success rate
Niacinamide alone: 2.75% (slightly below market)
Centella alone: 5.57% (clearly superior base ingredient)
Strategic Insights:
Centella outperforms Niacinamide as a base anti-acne ingredient
Zinc PCA is the ultimate booster (+179% improvement potential)
Real cosmetic efficacy rates are low (2-8% range is normal)
Combinations that show 2x+ improvement are genuinely significant
🚀 Strategic Recommendations
Maximum Efficacy: Niacinamide + Zinc PCA for premium positioning
Validated Leader: Centella + Madecassoside for evidence-based claims
Mass Market: Centella + Hyaluronic Acid for broad consumer appeal
Base Ingredient Choice: Consider Centella over Niacinamide for anti-acne focus
The corrected dashboard now shows realistic success rates while highlighting combinations that genuinely outperform market baseline - providing actionable insights for your formulation strategy.
Analyse Pleasantness vs Duration vs Intensity and Comfort for Candidate Fragrances
A new angle for our research topic could be:
For GenZ fragrance preferences, plot pleasantness vs duration.
Combine pleasantness-duration findings with intensity to understand how to develop our anti-acne seerum for combination skins.Here's a new dashboard for decision making on the topic:


Here's the key findings:
🎯 Critical Gen-Z Fragrance Discoveries
🏆 Teen-Specific Winner: Citrus
1.50 pleasantness score (highest among teens)
0.25 intensity (perfect light presence)
0.0 duration (neutral, not overpowering)
Direct teen validation shows citrus is the clear favorite
📊 Pleasantness × Duration Sweet Spot
Optimal Duration Range: -0.1 to +0.1 (moderate duration)
760 reviews in this range achieve 1.01 average pleasantness
Avoid quick-fading (< -0.3): drops to 0.65 pleasantness
Avoid too persistent (> +0.2): may overwhelm Gen-Z preferences
⚡ Intensity-Comfort Critical Findings
Sweet Spot: 0.7-0.8 intensity with 0.5+ comfort
Risk Zone: 0.9+ intensity significantly reduces comfort
Youth Preference: Light presence allows personal fragrance layering
🚀 Strategic Recommendations
🥇 Primary Strategy: Water/Aquatic
Pleasantness: 1.20 (highest overall)
Duration: -0.02 (perfect neutral)
Intensity: 0.74 (youth sweet spot)
Positioning: "Pure, clean, fresh" - ideal for anti-acne messaging🥈 Alternative Strategy: Fruity
Pleasantness: 1.09 (strong Gen-Z appeal)
Duration: -0.05 (optimal range)
Intensity: 0.78 (comfortable for youth)
Positioning: "Playful, optimistic" - makes skincare fun vs medicinal🎯 Guidelines
Target Duration: -0.1 to +0.1 range for optimal acceptance
Intensity Cap: Maximum 0.85 to maintain comfort
Teen Focus: Citrus notes for authentic Gen-Z appeal
Daily Routine: Light enough for morning use + makeup compatibility
⚠️ Critical Avoidances
Intensity > 0.9: Drops comfort significantly
Duration < -0.3: Consumers feel shortchanged
Green/Aromatic: Only 0.71 pleasantness (risky for Gen-Z)
This data provides a clear roadmap for creating a Gen-Z optimized fragrance that balances pleasantness, appropriate duration, and comfortable intensity levels specifically for anti-acne combination skin serums.
Next Steps
Discover guided examples for Innovation and R&D Teams
See more Data you can query
Request a Premium Plan
Last updated

